So as anyone in EMS knows, there is the necessary evil of recertification/refreshers that we must go through on a regular basis. Well recently I went through my CPR and my ACLS refreshers and boy were my eyes opened wide. Now I must say that I am an avid fan of completing as much of my recert/refresher stuff online as allowable by state statute. Anyone who has taken online classes can probably understand why, but I find it very convenient in that I can do it on my time and at my pace. Some areas I spend more time on, such as dopamine drip rates and trying to figure out correct calculations using various equations and shortcuts, while others not so much.
Here is where I am going to go into two different directions. The first one being that while I value the concepts and convenience of an online teaching platform I quickly realized the value of a traditional classroom setting. While at my ACLS refresher I think I learned more from that time spent in the classroom engaging in discussions and scenarios than I have in many online platforms, as it relates to ACLS. I guess the point I am trying to make here is the fact that while online platforms are very convenient and effective, there has got to be something said about the value of a traditional class room environment. The second direction I am going in is about an article I read online as it relates to EMS and education. The article addresses several different topics regarding education and meeting the needs of the students and how we might better serve our EMS providers if we teach to treat and not teach to pass an exam. This brings me back around to pace and the time in which we spend on educating students on the various aspects of EMS. Should the programs be designed around a specific number of hours or should they be based on the pace of an individual student and the amount of time a student might need on various subjects. Some students might require more time on EKG interpretations, while others might need a significantly less amount of time due to various reasons. So rather than teach every student at the same pace, maybe it should be around the needs of the individual student? I realize that this is a very complicated and sophisticated suggestion, but I think it is something that does generate good discussion both in favor of something like this or in opposition.
Anyway, if you have the time, feel free to share your thoughts.
Stay safe and have a great day.















NFPA 1917 Ambulance Standard is out for Public Comment
The ROP draft of NFPA 1917, Standard for Automotive Ambulances is out for Public Comment. This published document includes changes made after the Proposal period. A number of changes were made from the intitial draft of the document. Anyone with an interest in ambulances should review the ROP draft and submit commet by August 30, 2011. Copies of the ROP draft can be downloaded from the NFPA Doc Info Page for NFPA 1917. Comment forms can also be downloaded from NFPA's website
Larry Stewart
Posted by Larry Stewart on July 27, 2011 at 01:11 PM in Apparatus and Equipment, Committees Seeking Comments, EMS, NFPA Standards & Activities | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | |
|
|
| Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us